 | |  |  | | | | | | | | | | | | |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
| Author |
Message |
shadowfx
B.V. VIP - Pioneer
Joined: Oct 08, 2001
Posts: 3969
Location: New Hampshire
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:49 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| |
| Pretty much I just removed that whole portion of the conversation. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
thomaspayne
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Aug 27, 2006
Posts: 999
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| I don't think you should have removed it. Free speech is a wonderful thing because it exposes people for they are. Glad I documented this on other boards. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
uxo_tech
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Jul 15, 2004
Posts: 2680
Location: Texas North - Alberta
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Brightraven wrote: |
| The truth about WMD got well and truly out! |
Too bad people like you don't want to listen to the truth neh?
"It was reasonable to conclude that Iraq posed an imminent threat. What we learned during the inspection made Iraq a more dangerous place potentially than, in fact, we thought it was even before the war," – 1/28/04 Dr. David Kay testimony to Senate Armed Services. Committee
The simple fact of the matter is that the consensus of all Western intelligence agencies including those of the French and Germans was that Iraq was hiding items from inspections and firmly intended to restart their programs once the sanctions were lifted or as was more likely totally collapsed.
And a good portion of the intelligence that Bush used to justify the invasion was provided by European agencies.
If you want to put your hands over your hands over your ears and go "Lalalala can't hear you" that's your right but that doesn't make you in any way correct about your beliefs.
| Brightraven wrote: |
| Now we have the truth of WTC REALLY hitting the fan! |
It's been out as well for quite some time. The fact that none of you are capable of recognizing it as such is no one else's problem but your own.
| Brightraven wrote: |
| Fasten your seatbelts weak-kneers! |
Uh... okay. Sure. Whatever you say boss... |
|
_________________
Ex Ignorantia Ad Sapientiam; E Luce Ad Tenebras
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Weapons of Mass Destruction were NEVER found in Iraq!
- Dr David Kelly; the world's Number One scientist and expert on WMD, died whilst trying to reveal this FACT! - A DREADFUL and SHAMEFUL story!
The existence of WMD in Iraq was the premise and 'intelligence' which was fed to Bush and Blair falsely by their secret services and was their excuse for the illegal invasion of Iraq ... NOT passed by the UN.
In Britain, Blair blithely told us we could all be bombed in 45 minutes by Saddam Hussein in the Parliament of Westminster as the Thames flowed sweetly by. It became known as the "Dodgy Dossier" all over the British media (of sexed-up misinformation.)
As it was proven all FALSE, it turns out not even a flaming pigeon could have arrived in Trafalgar Square from Iraq!
Then we were all told DEMOCRACY was going to be established in Iraq.
- ON THE BACK OF A TANK?
God alone knows who is deceiving whom on this issue.
HE is the ultimate boss, despite our funny tricks!
... But the 'awakening' would seem soon to be here; and the sleeping will end ... once the softening and panic-mongering to prepare the public for World War III has been completed.
Perhaps its time for an even worse false-flag outrage to get us into the mood before the pot goes off the boil!
... Is all that just caprice and whim on my part? - Flights of fancy with no limits, and nothing else, from my befuddled brain?
WOULD THAT IT WERE SO! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Arch_Stanton
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Dec 04, 2002
Posts: 155
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Well, jeez-o-petes. Only sushi could taste a little more fishy than this.
http://infowars.net/articles/february2007/280207BBC.htm
"BBC Has Lost Tapes Of 21st Century's Defining Moment
...The BBC was forced into claiming that the recordings covering the 9/11 attacks have mysteriously vanished in response to fierce criticism over the fact that on the day the news agency reported that World Trade Center Building 7 had collapsed almost 30 minutes before it actually came down..." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Sentience
Newbie
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Because I am sure everyone took the time zone difference into account on those videos.
Besides an invasion does not have to be legalized, that is why you call it an INVASION. Yes we did invade Iraq, we crushed their military and captured their leader, declared martial law and forcibly changed their government. But there is nothing wrong with that. We have the power and the means to do so and that is what defines who controls what and who doesn't. Simple the weak die out and the strong survive mentality. Whether or not anyone likes to admit it, Iraq was a growing hostile force which posed a significant threat to the international community. An unstable madman with a bunch of guns isn't a person you want in your neighborhood is it?
Regarding the WTC attacks, hundreds, literally hundreds of scientists, engineers, eyewitnesses, firefighters, policeman and many others have testified against any such conspiracy with cold hard evidence. Yet people still attempt to say it was a planned attack. How could anyone in the world possibly mastermind such an operation. The amount of people that would need to be murdered or blackmailed or silenced is immense, impossible one might say. For all you naysayers and conspiracists, heres a point-by-point disproving of the most popular WTC arguments.
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
There you have it in a nutshell ... VERY WELL expressed.
The world is set on the darkest path it has ever been. The band has stopped playing, but the raucous dancers twirl on regardless with their uneasy guffaws and laughter.
The Invitation to Disaster is well and truly here; just as was seen before the rise of the Third Reich.
"History repeats itself" ... so they say ... and it would seem simply because unfettered vainglory pushes humankind into the most grotesque of pirouettes ...
Just consider the pathetic end of Herr Adolf Hitler in his underground bunker.
The blog sites act as fantastic thermometers and litmus tests for those with eyes to see the rant and tirade for what it is.
IF THE CAP FITS ... THEN WEAR IT! ... WHOEVER RECOGNISES THEMSELF HERE!
You are most welcome. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
armitage_vi
Newbie
Joined: Jan 04, 2007
Posts: 14
Location: Savannah,GA
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
I think that this is a big deal in the 9/11 Cover-up because NOT only has the BBC all of sudden lost it's tapes, but the fact that there is a BBC reporter in front of the building talking about it going down, THEN the live feed goes crazy and the next time you see her the building is gone...
I was trying to explain this to people and everyone just didn't get it, they all said "So what is the big deal the news reported incorrectly what else is new"... However the important thing is that Building 7 was a mystery and the official story was that they had NO idea it was coming down.
Despite all the eyewitness reports of firefighters telling them it's coming down, hearing Silverstein say "We were gonna pull it, and so we pulled it"... It's a big deal because it shows and proves that people KNEW it was going to come down even though nothing hit that building...
Why is it that people can't see the obvious cover-up and severe amount of questions that were raised on that day?
It annoys me that people want to talk about UFO's and Lochness Monsters, and ghosts, but when it comes to the biggest story of our time with MASS amounts of evidence and question people just dismiss the events of 9/11.... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
chiselray
B.V. Truth Hunter
Joined: Feb 16, 2002
Posts: 15200
Location: **IN NUMBER 37
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| armitage_vi wrote: |
I think that this is a big deal in the 9/11 Cover-up because NOT only has the BBC all of sudden lost it's tapes, but the fact that there is a BBC reporter in front of the building talking about it going down, THEN the live feed goes crazy and the next time you see her the building is gone...
I was trying to explain this to people and everyone just didn't get it, they all said "So what is the big deal the news reported incorrectly what else is new"... However the important thing is that Building 7 was a mystery and the official story was that they had NO idea it was coming down.
Despite all the eyewitness reports of firefighters telling them it's coming down, hearing Silverstein say "We were gonna pull it, and so we pulled it"... It's a big deal because it shows and proves that people KNEW it was going to come down even though nothing hit that building...
Why is it that people can't see the obvious cover-up and severe amount of questions that were raised on that day?
It annoys me that people want to talk about UFO's and Lochness Monsters, and ghosts, but when it comes to the biggest story of our time with MASS amounts of evidence and question people just dismiss the events of 9/11.... |
Well saidarmitage_vi
People cant see the cover up because they are being fed bs and have been all their lives by popular media broadcasting...Unfortunately what has been a trusted link to world affairs is nothing more than a tool to the big wigs who edit the storylines,it isnt hard to do,editing is an important part of how a story develops,in the 9/11 coverage of the years ,instead of editing the story which they have done,its more like its been developed or told like some kind of fiction novel...fed to those people who just listen ,even the reporters probably question the evidence they spread,but hell they are just the pawns like we all are |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
At least the BBC is allowing many VERY damning posts on its blog-page. That in itself is AMAZING!
I wonder if a BBC polarisation is the reason, within its very own borders!
... This very idea of Good and Bad polarising is very unsettling ... And it really does seem to be happening on a global scale, well beyond race, class, religion or creed.
The frighteningly SINISTER side to all this is that this momentous BBC Clairvoyant Cock-up news has still not got into the mainline media!
... Clearly indicative of EXACTLY how right the so-called "conspiracy nutters" actually are! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
uxo_tech
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Jul 15, 2004
Posts: 2680
Location: Texas North - Alberta
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Sentience wrote: |
The amount of people that would need to be murdered or blackmailed or silenced is immense, impossible one might say. For all you naysayers and conspiracists, heres a point-by-point disproving of the most popular WTC arguments.
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm |
Nice try Sentience... full marks for effort.
That particular link has been posted here repeatedly but continually gets ignored by the oh so "knowledgeable" conspiracy theorists like those in the thread.
What it really boils down to is that every single professional association of architects, engineers, fire safety officials, metallurgists, etc... all agree with the NIST report. Not just in the USA but worldwide.
Then layer in the thousands of emergency responders, law enforcement, intelligence and military personnel who have been involved in the investigation since then and there's still no dissent with the report from professionals commenting about their field.
Really what it boils down to is that their conspiracy must be composed of a few hundred thousand people... perhaps even millions... around the world for everything to work the way they said it has.
Ah well... at least we haven't had the Holographic Planes or Missile Theory crop up recently although the way these things work they'll make an appearance again I'm sure. |
|
_________________
Ex Ignorantia Ad Sapientiam; E Luce Ad Tenebras
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
It's clear where the caps are fitting folks!
WHAT a jaunty angle they like to wear it at, don't they? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Yes! I am a "911 Conspiracy Nutter" ... I didn't use to be until the BBC "Clairvoyant Cock-up" ...
So the BBC 'lost' all their footage from 911!!! Are YOU going to believe that?
So the BBC's Jane Standley told the whole wide world on live TV that WTC Building 7 had collapsed while it was standing intact, as bold as brass, behind her pretty head ... TWENTY-THREE MINUTES BEFORE IT ACTUALLY FELL! ... THEN the BBC cut transmission!!
AND, all this, a FULL EIGHT HOURS AFTER THE TWIN TOWERS COLLAPSED!
Are YOU going to find excuses for that too?
What the HELL is going on???
Didn't all the official reports tell us Building 7, like the Twin Towers, UNEXPECTEDLY collapsed? - That NOTHING like this was ever envisaged?
YES! ... WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
chiselray
B.V. Truth Hunter
Joined: Feb 16, 2002
Posts: 15200
Location: **IN NUMBER 37
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Brightraven wrote: |
Yes! I am a "911 Conspiracy Nutter" ... I didn't use to be until the BBC "Clairvoyant Cock-up" ...
So the BBC 'lost' all their footage from 911!!! Are YOU going to believe that?
So the BBC's Jane Standley told the whole wide world on live TV that WTC Building 7 had collapsed while it was standing intact, as bold as brass, behind her pretty head ... TWENTY-THREE MINUTES BEFORE IT ACTUALLY FELL! ... THEN the BBC cut transmission!!
AND, all this, a FULL EIGHT HOURS AFTER THE TWIN TOWERS COLLAPSED!
Are YOU going to find excuses for that too?
What the HELL is going on???
Didn't all the official reports tell us Building 7, like the Twin Towers, UNEXPECTEDLY collapsed? - That NOTHING like this was ever envisaged?
YES! ... WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?! |
Keep it up brother,the word is out...this goal is ours
Just imagine it,word is in the wtc has collapsed to bbc television...because it was about to blow...but then all of a sudden  ...the demolition squad were a few minutes out...obviously those few minute were to stop a breach happening in the plans...fk fk 
"but but..wev'e already send word the tower is going down  "
fk fk fk..too late now
"ahh man...what do we do ? "
"we just let it ride  JUST LET IT RIDE (click)" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
It is SO HARD to keep the pot boiling here! We must somehow TURN UP THE GAS They LONG for this CATASTROPHIC story to get lost and go cold! ... Have you got any ideas?
All the best buddy!
Alan. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| |
blocks-left.jpg
blocks-left.jpg
blocks-left.jpg
|  |
Online Stats: 
