 | |  |  | | | | | | | | | | | | |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
| Author |
Message |
thomaspayne
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Aug 27, 2006
Posts: 999
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:27 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| |
Complete bull. #7 was NOT gutted. (edit by shadowfx- try not to swear ok. tks)
Nobody has accused the BBC of being part of the plot to execute 9/11. That's a red herring. As for the script, I thought I mentioned this, but I will again:
I saw on some forum where someone mentioned: What if flight 93 was meant for building 7? GREAT THOUGHT! That makes perfect sense. Larry Silverstein owned just those three bldgs - the Twin Towers and #7. So, let's say they were all prewired with explosives, and the plan was to crash a plane into each one, hoodwinking the public into believing that could collapse the bldgs. Flight 93 crashed, or was more likely shot down by USAF pilot whose superiors didn't get the memo. The towers are hit, as planned, and detonated. But where is flight 93, says Silverstein & company? Oh, sh*t, we've got that baby wired up and ready to come down - now, what? We're gonna have to come up with SOMETHING, some reason to bring it down. So, they float the story that it's so damaged that it's certain to collapse, at any time. It takes a while to spread that around to the media. It MUST be reported, or people will question why a bldg not hit by anything collapses! Wolf Blitzer is the first to oblige. It's rush copy, with the whole lie all laid out, and the BBC simply screws up, jumping ahead on the timeline. When they caught the error, they cut the feed to Jane Standley. Because of the necessity of floating that story first, bldg 7 COULDN'T collapse on schedule. Thus, the 8+ hour delay. It had to be "framed", first, or we would not accept what we saw, and the official reason that it did.
1. Bldg 7 had MINIMAL damage.
2. NO SKYSCRAPER HAS EVER COLLAPSED FORM FIRE
3. Many other bldgs were SEVERELY damaged that day, and did not collapse. In fact, they had to be brought down with controlled demolition, later.
4. If news services were going to speculate about possible collapses, it would have NOT have been #7. #6 was totaled, but didn't collapse. The customs bldg was burned to the shell of the steel structure, and didn't collapse.
5. Flight 93 was headed for NYC.
6. The BBC has now become complicit with their cover up.
7. 9/11 was inside job. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
VERY interesting stuff just posted ... But stupid.
No amount of smoke and mirrors is going to hide THIS story!
God in heaven ALWAYS sees to it that the truth will out.
If that were not so, Herr Adolf Hitler would have been a revered saint and elder by now! ... Instead of that, he slugged a bullet in his brain and died underground like a rat in a sewer, with his new bride's kiss with bitter cyanide on her ruby lips. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Why on earth would they fly a plane into building 7? If they did, that would be when the public would think something strange was going on, and not if it fell on its own. The Pentagon and the twin towers made sense but there is no logic in attacking buiilding number 7. I for one would be questioning why a terrorist organisation targeted such significant buildings... then building 7. As with the scripting, this would leave a trail right to the people responsible if this was an inside job and they would not be so stupid. You have yet to provide any proof that this is anything more than misreporting. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
The truth about WMD got well and truly out! Now we have the truth of WTC REALLY hitting the fan!
Fasten your seatbelts weak-kneers! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Jane Standley reported the collapse of WTC Building 7, clearly fully intact behind her pretty head at 4:57 EST ... It ACTUALLY fell at 5:20 EST ... Just as well the transmission went 'dead' 5 minutes before, wasn't it?!
Poor dear Jane, in the 'confusion' ... a FULL WORKING DAY OF 8 HOURS AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF THE TWIN TOWERS AT 9 IN THE MORNING ... really didn't have much time to know what was going on and where the Saloman Brothers Building was, did she? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| It doesn't matter what time of day it was, the chaos was on going all day. People didn't go crazy for an hour then just go back about their normal business. You have yet to provide any information that proves this isn't just a case of misreporting. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
thomaspayne
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Aug 27, 2006
Posts: 999
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| How's that brainwashing working out for you, Slan? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
thomaspayne
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Aug 27, 2006
Posts: 999
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
I'll post these on both of these BBC/WT7 threads. Just saw these posts, elsewhere, and haven't had time to review the info. Remember to listen to C2C, tonight (Saturady).
Posted on Saturday, March 03, 2007 - 9:08 am:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Hawkins is scheduled for C2C tonight, I think.
Quoted from
http://www.hawkscafe.com/
The Teachers and Teamsters' private-equity managers, including World Bank advisors, Maurice Strong and Dr. John McArthur, felt threatened by the renewal of a Giuliani-Bush reform agenda and the stage was set for the shock and bait of RICO 9/11.
During the June 1-2, 2001 ‘Amalgam Virgo’ war game, Teachers and Boeing insiders, including a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, used instrument approach procedures to fly hijacked planes with the U.S. Air Force ordered to stand down.
When Dr. Deutch launched the privately sponsored war game ‘Global Guardian’ on 9/11, he chose to simulate ‘al-Qaeda’ hijacking attacks with red team flying Boeing aircraft, modified with embedded fuel bombs, into buildings rigged with embedded fuel bombs.
Deutch’s games were staged with Boeing and NATO AWACS aircraft, illegally-leased by Darleen Druyun, Clinton’s corrupt head of procurement for the U.S. Air Force.
New York firefighters responded to the shock of the 9/11 attack by entering the North and South Towers to help victims escape and put out low-intensity fires. Their analog Motorola radio systems appear to have been jammed; they did not receive the order to evacuate and over 300 firefighter bodies were liquidated when the buildings were demolished by what appears to be a shockwave from fuel bombs in the towers.
On 9/11, with the pulverized cement dust still settling in Manhattan, Teamsters’ Local 831 members from the New York City Department of Sanitation began hosing down the streets, flushing evidence of murder and ultra-high temperature arson into the sewers.
On 9/11, the contractor working on 7 World Trade Center diesel systems was ordered to pull the ...
a recent snippet from New York Times..
Insurer's Financial Weakness May Imperil Trade Center Project
By Joseph B. Treaster and Charles V. Bagli
"A new financing gap may be about to open in the rebuilding plan for ground zero. One of the insurance companies that provided coverage for the World Trade Center is in financial trouble and may not be able to pay the $250 million claim that the developer Larry A. Silverstein and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey say they are owed as a result of the destruction of the complex
by terrorists in 2001. The money from Royal & SunAlliance USA, the American subsidiary of a big British in..."
February 8, 2007 New York and Region News
.........................................
Then check out Lucky Larry's internet site..
http://www.silversteinproperties.com/
a snippet:
December 22, 2006 – "Larry Silverstein and the cause of ground zero-area reconstruction got a holiday present yesterday: another signed lease at 7 World ..."
The joy might be due to negotiations with ABN AMRO the Dutch investment company
and certainly puts a new twist on the sayings such as happy as larry and every cloud has a silverstein lining.
While you're focussing on
" OMFG!! the BBC FOOTAGE!!!!
Larry's still doing very nicely thank you. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Something was misreported, with no evidence to suggest otherwise. No brainwashing required. If you can show me any evidence to show it wasn't a case of simple misreporting, I'm more than open to it. As I have said before, I am unbias and I am not looking for evidence to defend either side. I see things for what they are. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
We read: "Something was misreported, with no evidence to suggest otherwise."
... SPOT ON! ABSOLUTELY! ... We all KNOW!
- The 'evidence' is self-explanatory:
Jane Standley reported the fall of the WTC Building 7 at 4.57 EST.
The building actually fell at 5.20 EST.
That IS, indeed, the evidence in itself that something was VERY 'misreported' and something also VERY amiss! ... Particularly when the very building mentioned was standing as bold as brass seen through the gigantic windows behind the hapless newscaster's befuddled head!
Yes, indeed, there is 'no evidence to suggest otherwise'.
IT ALL ACTUALLY HAPPENED AS RELATED HERE; ALL VERY NATURALLY OF COURSE! NOTHING TO ARGUE ABOUT AT ALL ... (is there?)
How dare anyone cast aspersions as to the perfection of the BBC? (ahem!) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Who said the BBC was perfect? The very fact they misreported something shows they aren't, just like every other broadcaster. Still no evidence to suggest it was anything other than a simple case of misreporting I see. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
There's a lot of Scottish mist flying around the place at the moment!
As it clears, there is some amazing pristine thinking shining through! ...
FLIGHT 93 was originally destined for Building 7! ...
Now there's a BRILLIANT focus on possible explanations!
Possible yes, at the moment ... NOBODY is saying "DEFINITELY" ... yet!
So our astute blog buddy, Thomas Payne, puts forth the very plausible supposition!!! ... Hammer away at that one, Thomas, until your supposition is possibly shown to be untenable!
BUT IT SEEMS YOU MAY HAVE HIT THE JACKPOT ON THIS ONE!
FOLLOW IT THROUGH FOLKS!!! (Let the ostriches just get even more knee-wobbly!) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
okiejack
B.V. Info-a-holic
Joined: Sep 29, 2001
Posts: 8767
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| TheSlan wrote: |
| Who said the BBC was perfect? The very fact they misreported something shows they aren't, just like every other broadcaster. Still no evidence to suggest it was anything other than a simple case of misreporting I see. |
Hey Slan! These guys are obviously not interested in the truth. They are only interested in denying reality. These guys don't even realize what they are doing is Witchcraft i.e. repeating a lie over and over until they believe it themselves. These are the same types that gather in mobs to march in protest of reality.
Anyhow I just thought I'd mention this to you. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
HERE WE GO!! ... It HAD to come, didn't it?!
All of us with our thinking caps on are now to be considered just a bunch of Harry Potters trotting about the world with poxy potions in our pouches!!!
It would be killingly funny but that +3,000 people got sent to Kingdom Come.
WITCHCRAFT???? WHICH CRAFT was destined for Building 7?
COULD BE FLIGHT 93! ... Now there's a magic solution to bother the Saloman Brothers! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| |
blocks-left.jpg
blocks-left.jpg
blocks-left.jpg
|  |
Online Stats: 
