 | |  |  | | | | | | | | | | | | |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 8:27 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| |
There is absolutly nothing to suggest that this is anything other than a case of misreporting, Quik. That isn't being blind, in fact, that is anything but. I see the BBC making a mistake and admitting it was a mistake. There is no reason what so ever to suspect foul play. People jumped on this story far too quickly, and I think they realize it. Where are the people that were promoting this story when it first surfaced, claiming it was a smoking gun? They don't mention it now. Strange they wouldn't if it was the smoking gun they've been looking for.
Are you going to provide answers to the important questions I posed regarding this topic? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
Lcpl-QUIK
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 2021
Location: IL,U.S.A.-Looking into the light to see the 'TRUTH'
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Hardly since I do not possess them.
I only state what should be obvious, and therefore questioned. But just like all the information on 09/11/01, it is purposely obscurred and given WAY too many different angles that amount to NOTHING.
Just like when the pentagon would not give us the feed footage from it's sec cams. That is except for that SORRY excuse for a film.
This is the same. Purposely obscure the story so that NO truth can be allowed to surface.
It is called 'hedging your bets'. Especially when your not interested one way or another with the outcome, except when your true purpose isn't on THAT particular bet in the first place. You have to ask yourself what is the TRUE purpose of not allowing truth and what is the REAL plan if this is the smoke screen?
Like any magician or illusionist does..... misdirection of the onlooker to achieve your true goal.
What is the true goal if all the answers are a lie or misconception? |
|
_________________
You are Never so far into the dark that you cannot step into the Light and see!
There is nothing more deadly than a U.S. Marine, their loaded rifle, and an enemy in sight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
I don't see any obscuring of the truth, or attempt to hide it from you. We all seen the video, what else do you want? Even if the BBC still had their videos, you would have just seen the same thing again. As for the question, I shall repost them for you:
| Quote: |
| Why would the reporters be scripted? Why risk letting so many people know? Why not just let the building fall and allow it to be reported naturally? Why has nobody came out saying they were scripted? There would have to have been hundreds if not thousands of people in on it for reporters to be scripted. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Lcpl-QUIK
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 2021
Location: IL,U.S.A.-Looking into the light to see the 'TRUTH'
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
I believe I DID give my answer.
Obscuring the real answers with false ones, in order to gain secrecy of the true agenda, plan, or reasons.
When the entire situation,(to include this news report) is muddled up and NO real answers given to direct questions,(except by the drive-by media or satelite civilians who have no legitimacy) THAT is obscuring the facts. |
|
_________________
You are Never so far into the dark that you cannot step into the Light and see!
There is nothing more deadly than a U.S. Marine, their loaded rifle, and an enemy in sight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| You didn't give any answers to the questions. Also, what proof do you have, on this specific subject, that it is anything other than misreporting? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Get in there Quik!
Look below and see yet another, crisp, crystal clear climate where clouds cannot cover ... (I couldn't resist that ... SORRY!)
Read and see how refreshing the air is here:
http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html
You couldn't find the air purer even in Switzerland than on this MAGNIFICENT site! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
... On a more mundane subject ... I'm just off to the supermarket to find some pure cocoa before they close.
I promised to bake a cake of a mentally handicapped 19-year-old girl's choice. She chose chocolate.
The girl's mother, after 2 months in Argentina, came back and drank sulphuric acid drain-cleaner while her family slept. A week ago tomorrow was when she committed suicide.
YES ... a true story and horrible ... Maybe hard to believe, just like 911.
Regarding the cake, this is my way, albeit pathetic, to try to cheer Luisina up. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| I don't see the point in the link. Nobody is denying the BBC misreported, or cocked up. The problem arises when people like yourself claim the reporters were scripted and claim this to be a smoking gun, without a shred of evidence. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
For SOME people there is no link to this story and forum anywhere; it might all be make-believe for all they are concerned. But for those who might be honestly interested, here is the excellent link again:
http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html
Better to make our OWN minds up, folks, and use the grey matter God gave us to think with! If your brain does go round and round in circles, draw the conclusions from even deeper, and listen to what your instincts tell you ... but never from hysterical blabbering lips from any old uninformed source!
Again; if the cap fits then wear it ... Anyone out there who recognises themself here in that last comment!
(I must now get on with that cake preparation; more later! ... ¡Hasta luegito!) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| I didn't say there were no links to the story anywhere. You persist on putting words into my mouth. I merely said the site proves nothing. All it does is confirm the BBC misreported something, which nobody denied in the first place. As for calling me a dimwit, after all your comments about me looking for an argument it seems you are the only one aiming insults at people. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
POST DATA (before I cream the sugar and butter) ...
We hear the BBC's Richard Porter blithely defend Jane Standley's 'flight of fancy' ...
"Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute by minute what she said or did ... "
GOOD GRIEF!!
... This very same Jane Standley woman is being televised live in the studio in New York. She tells the entire world through the BBC that WTC Building 7 has collapsed when it is standing behind her!
http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html
The programme is suddenly CUT ... FIVE MINUTES LATER WTC Building 7 actually collapses behind her!
Unless Jane Standley is really a talking potato how could she NOT
REMEMBER THAT SHE HAD JUST ANNOUNCED TO THE WORLD THAT THE
BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED ... SHE COULD EVEN READ IT AS HEADLINES
ON THE MONITOR ... AND THEN IT FELL DOWN BEHIND HER FIVE
MINUTES LATER IN REALITY? ... AND ... AND ... AND ... AND
FILMED FOR SURE, INTO THE BARGAIN! (THOUGH NOT TELEVISED, OF
COURSE!) ...
... Unless the entire camera crew and studio staff went into mass catalepsy because of their berserk 'mistake', if you insist on calling it that!
In that unreal scenario would THAT not have been 'SEARED' on everyone's mind and would have warranted the adverb "unsurpringly" ???????????????????
YES!
YES!
YES!
... From VERY BAD, the BBC'S pathetic explanations have turned out to be quite simply ...
CATASTROPHIC! ....
The smell of dead fish has reached the Moon!
THE TALKING JANE STANDLEY POTATO HATH SPOKEN!
... Some might point an accusing finger at me with that! I'm not bothered! ....
Unfortunately for Jane Standley, the finger does point directly at her, for her obviously MORONIC, POTATO-LIKE FORGETFULNESS! ... (Unless ... unless ... unless ... ??)
http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html
THE LINK TO THE STORY YET AGAIN. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Someone lost their cool a little bit there, didn't they? Anyway, despite all that, the fact doesn't change that the link only confirms what we already knew. The BBC misreported something. It doesn't matter how many times you post it, that is going to remain the fact. With all the choas of that day, it isn't suprising the reporter can't remember every detail. She reported a lot that day she probably couldn't remember. I doubt anyone could remember exactly what they said and did that day, down to the button. There still hasn't been one shred of evidence to show the reporters were scripted. Firstly, there would be no need to script reporters, they could just have allowed the building to fall and have it reported naturally. Secondly, there would have had to be hundreds, if not thousands, of people from many different countries in on it for them to be script. Are we to believe out of those thousands not one single person has come forward? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Lcpl-QUIK
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 2021
Location: IL,U.S.A.-Looking into the light to see the 'TRUTH'
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
I said what I said.
This IS what I have said since discussions have been made while I have been on here BEFORE YOU came on.
There are arguements, discussions, and PLENTY of whacko ideas which have been put forth. AND as I have said I DO NOT believe any of them so far because they do NOT equal out to what I saw that day.
Any continuous questioning doesn't change the answer I will give.
UNTIL there is some REAL logical answers ARE given.
Just because YOU have no clear memories of that day, even before or after only states that you're a TERRIBLE witness. Not everyone else having bad memories. |
|
_________________
You are Never so far into the dark that you cannot step into the Light and see!
There is nothing more deadly than a U.S. Marine, their loaded rifle, and an enemy in sight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Firstly, not that it matters, I have been here from the beginning. This is my second account because of a problem I had with my original. Other members will testify to that.
As for me being a terrible witness, perhaps you haven't noticed I am not from America. That means I have no reason to support or oppose your government, I am merely saying what I see. A case of misreporting that conspiracy theorists have jumped on as a smoking gun without a shred of evidence. Also, I didn't say that nobody had any clear memories of that day, I said that I doubted (note that I'm not saying they couldn't) that people could remember exactly what happened that day. That means they could have crystal clear memories of parts, and not remember other things.
Finally, I am not sure what I think of 9/11. I do think the government isn't telling the people everything, but I don't think I would go as far as to say that it was an inside job. However, this isn't about that. This is specifically about this story. You say you do not believe all the arguments, discussion and whacko ideas, which is why I posed the questions. There is no evidence to say the reporters were scripted, not one single shred. I believe that this falls into the whacko idea category. It is people that jump on things like this that hinder the search for the truth you and the rest of America are looking for Quik. I actually think we agree and may have got our wires crossed. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Lcpl-QUIK
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 2021
Location: IL,U.S.A.-Looking into the light to see the 'TRUTH'
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
AA-ight then. 
I think it is extremely dubious that not only did that report occur the way it did. But to further exacerbate the situation, the BBC "lost" the recordings?
Methinks this is extremely similar to NASA reporting on the loss of the originals to the U.S. Moonshot Mission.
This type of behavior in a court of law is usually an in indication of circumstantial 'guilt'. Most juries would convict in such cases, due to the defendant issueing such comments.
I'm just saying. |
|
_________________
You are Never so far into the dark that you cannot step into the Light and see!
There is nothing more deadly than a U.S. Marine, their loaded rifle, and an enemy in sight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| |
blocks-left.jpg
blocks-left.jpg
blocks-left.jpg
|  |
Online Stats: 
