 | |  |  | | | | | | | | | | | | |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:19 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| |
| I can see what you are saying, and I agree that the missing of the tapes is strange. However, I do not think this is enough to declare a smoking gun, or even say it suggests a cover up. The tapes going missing is the only strange thing about this, as misreporting is a very common occurance. In fact, I'd say it is more likely to happen while reporting incidents like 9/11 when the situation is so choatic. There is some evidence surrounding 9/11 that suggests the people aren't being told the whole story, but I do not think this falls into that category and only serves to hinder the search for truth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
Lcpl-QUIK
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 2021
Location: IL,U.S.A.-Looking into the light to see the 'TRUTH'
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Hell I even remember that the 'original' reports saying that the body count was between 10 and 30 THOUSAND. Which of course had to be ammended due to lack of actual personel BEING there that day. It MIGHT have been close to being true HAD all the people actually been there that day.
Luckily not. |
|
_________________
You are Never so far into the dark that you cannot step into the Light and see!
There is nothing more deadly than a U.S. Marine, their loaded rifle, and an enemy in sight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
A little story:
A woman somewhere in North America, on a live prestigious TV channel, states that a particular very big building has just collapsed; but a building obviously still, in fact, standing and visible, through a large window in a studio overlooking the disaster site. - Eight hours earlier two much higher buildings had collapsed nearby and could be seen smoking behind the reporter's head too.
... The collapse of the third building, she clearly confirms at 3 minutes to the hour just as the programme begins, 'officially' having just happened. That breaking news then appears as headlines written across the lower portion of the TV screen, while it is being televised to the world.
The woman carries on calmly talking to a newscaster back in Europe for another 18 minutes, indicating that fortunately, there was no loss of life because the area had been sealed off.
The singularly odd story gets interrupted suddenly as the connection from North America to Europe gets cut ... Just five short minutes before the building that had been reported as collapsed already, in fact ACTUALLY collapses! ... Right behind that OBVIOUSLY, now astonished, reporter's head! AN ASTONISHMENT WHICH WAS NEVER SEEN; DUE SOLEY TO THE CUT, OF COURSE!
For 5 years and six months this so-called "misreporting" or "Cock-up" ... depending on which prestigious 'authority' you trust most ... was completely occulted.
Just a story; and just a little bit odd.
... But what is eerily WEIRD is that the prestigious European world-renowned TV channel in question, then, once the story was revealed, goes on to say that all the MANDATORY THREE COPIES OF THAT FOOTAGE FROM THAT DREADFUL DAY HAVE ALL BEEN LOST!
... But then this famous TV channel decides to add insult to injury! ...
... The spokesman for the company, then blithely informed everyone that the woman, who had 23 minutes prematurely informed the world of the collapse of the building, could not remember the building actually collapsing right behind her through the window after her 'mistake'!
... Now that DOES take the biscuit!
So, after all, perhaps we will soon be told the world, all along, has been flat!
Sorry, all you beautiful dreamers; make the most of it, dream on while you may! You are in for a bumpy ride.
Last edited by Brightraven on Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:09 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Once more I will point out the fact that for the reporters to be scripted, there would have had to have been hundreds or thousands in on it. World wide. Some countries that would love to see America in turmoil. However, not one single person has came forward saying they were scripted. Also, there would have been no reason to script them what so ever. Even if they did blow up the building, they could have done it and allowed the press to report it naturally. No risk. So why on Earth would they risk involving thousands of people they didn't have to? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Isn't this story BIZARRELY peculiar; but at the same time with aspects which are outrageously OBVIOUS? ...
... This was clearly not PLANNED as a mistake! ... WHO can argue about that? The BBC itself calls it a "cock-up" ... Nobody is here to argue the toss about semantics at all. We need to get beyond the nit-picking of dictionary definitions where such momentous events are being discussed.
Those who focus on that silly aspect have lost the point completely.
Flight 93 could quite possibly actually have been destined for WTC Building 7, already laced for "pulling" ... as Larry Silverstein indicated on TV on the day of 911 itself; letting the cat out of the bag well and truly. According to the 'official' proven flight path it seems Flight 93 was seemingly heading for the Capitol ... before the mutiny-revolt of the passengers forced the U-turn direction change.
Whatever, ALL the plans went awry with Filght 93 for the 'terrorists' whoever they were; it's immaterial at this point of the story. ... NO ARGUMENT HERE! - At the moment!
Even more mahem has followed right now this March 2007, with the BBC's admitted "cock-up" which embarrassingly, and catastrophically, underlines in stark relief the dreadful "cock-up" of Larry Silverstein on TV footage when he explains why the decision to demolish Building 7 was made! (To demolish a building takes WEEKS of preparation.)
The STIFLING of this story in the mainstream media is underlining yet again that something is catastrophically wrong with the official account of the WTC BUILDING 7/SALOMAN BROTHERS' BUILDING COLLAPSE.
OK! ... FORGET ALL THE WHYS AND WHEREFORES OF WHAT I HAVE JUST WRITTEN.
Only consider this, if you prefer:
IS IT NOT MAINSTREAM NEWS-WORTHY THAT THE MOST PRESTIGIOUS BROADCASTING COMPANY ON THE PLANET ... THE BBC ... HAS LOST ALL THREE COPIES OF ITS FOOTAGE OF THE MOST HIDEOUS ATTACK IN WORLD HISTORY?... LET ALONE THE POLEMICS OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THOSE ATTACKS IN THEMSELVES!
PRECISELY AT THIS POINT ... WITHOUT ANY OTHER POINTS
NECESSARY, WE SEE WHY THE SMELL OF FISH HAS REACHED THE MOON!
Last edited by Brightraven on Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:52 am; edited 4 times in total |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Still not quite keeping your cool in check, are you? This story isn't mainstream worthy because it is a non-story. The only strange thing about this story is that the videos went missing, the misreporting is a very common occurance. Quik pointed out a great example of this when he mentioned the body count. Are we to believe there is a conspiracy because they originally gave a body count which, thankfully, wasn't the final bodycount? I would also be suprised if this is the first time the BBC have ever lost tapes. After all, a person or people will be designated the job of filing them away and human error is a real possibility. I used to work in an accountants where copies of files had to be kept and they would disappear without a trace at times. The BBC losing the tapes doesn't prove a thin. Also, the fact remains that there would have been no reason to script the reporters or include hundreds of unnecessary people in the plot. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Get in there Quik! ... A thick Scottish mist is fast descending again to envelop the poor wee bairn! LOL! Time to leave the babbling brook, to babble to itself in the glen. I think I've done with roamin' in the gloamin'!
Once again ... If the cap fits; wear it folks!
... If you do, make sure it's set at a cocky, jaunty angle, with a sprig of heather attached! (I adore Scotland, by the way. I have amazing childhood memories of Findhorn Bay, the poor old witch of Cluny Hill rolled down the hill inside a barrel of spikes and a unique vanilla ice-cream I can still taste, which we had in an old ice-cream parlour in Forres!)
Nothing to argue the toss about there I would hope ... OCH AYE!
( I have to decorate Luisina's chocolate cake now, by the way ... if anyone thinks that has a conspiracy nutter hidden message; scroll back, you'll see it certainly does not.)
Last edited by Brightraven on Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:08 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| I don't see the point in the last post, other than to praise Scotland. You're right, I cannot against that. As for you encouraging Quik, I'm pleased you did. If you read back through the thread I think you'll find we discussed the matter and came to some kind of agreement on it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Some people say things like:
"There is some evidence surrounding 9/11 that suggests people aren't being told the whole story."
... Now there's what some people might call a gem of information. ...
I'd call it the understatement of the century! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| No matter what you call it, claiming things like this BBC story is a smoking gun without a shred of evidence hinders the search for truth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Hoots mon! ... Could the Sottiish mist get thicker? LOL
Hasta luegito ... ¡Es la hora de irse a la cama niñito! ...
Buenas noches desde España a todos. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TheSlan
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 818
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| The mist is only going to get thicker if conspiracy theorists persist on declaring smoking guns with no evidence and clutching at straws, obscuring the path to the truth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Lcpl-QUIK
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 2021
Location: IL,U.S.A.-Looking into the light to see the 'TRUTH'
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
See this is the problem Slan.
Trying to PROVE anything, when all the while you have idjits moaning about the price of cookies in Rio.
I SAY that most of what IS the truth has been so SPUN ASKEW,; That when we DO find out the 'truth', most people will deny it.
THAT is why 'they' script or lie. FOR that exact reason.
I KNOW MY GOVERNMENT. |
|
_________________
You are Never so far into the dark that you cannot step into the Light and see!
There is nothing more deadly than a U.S. Marine, their loaded rifle, and an enemy in sight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Brightraven
B.V. Lurker
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
I agree .... With everyone here ... The world IS flat: I want some evidence to show me that it is not. The conspiracy theory that it is round is UTTER NONSENSE .... Just a smoke screen and mirror trick.
Until I MYSELF have the TRUTH before me ... Just as the BBC ALWAYS DOES, despite their naughtinesses ....
I shall keep my my mind, AS ALWAYS ... Completely open and impervious to silly ideas! ... No matter HOW MANY people are deceived ...
I will remain aloft and basking in TRUTH! ... Because silly-billies never get anywhere in life. I like the CHALLENGE of finding the ultimate proof beyond the mores of the masses.
Scotch mist, or no Scotch mist.
Off to the city now ... Hasta luegito!
Last edited by Brightraven on Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| |
blocks-left.jpg
blocks-left.jpg
blocks-left.jpg
|  |
Online Stats: 
